BLACK mobile logo

united states

New US rules say countries with diversity policies are infringing human rights

November 21, 2025

The Trump administration is implementing new guidelines for the State Department's annual human rights report that redefine what constitutes human rights violations, now including countries with DEI policies, abortion subsidies, and certain free speech regulations. These instructions represent a dramatic departure from decades of bipartisan human rights reporting standards and extend the administration's domestic policy priorities into foreign policy. Critics, including former State Department officials, argue this weaponizes human rights principles for partisan purposes and excludes protections for women, LGBTQ+ individuals, and minorities traditionally covered under international law.

Who is affected

  • Countries with DEI, gender diversity, or race-based equity policies
  • Countries that subsidize abortion or facilitate mass migration
  • European democracies including the UK, France, and Germany (criticized for online hate speech laws)
  • Women, LGBTQ+ individuals, religious and ethnic minorities, and non-believers (whose rights critics say are being excluded)
  • US embassies and consulates responsible for compiling human rights reports
  • Rights campaigners and organizations like Human Rights First
  • US allies and perceived foes (receiving different levels of scrutiny)

What action is being taken

  • The State Department is issuing new rules to all US embassies and consulates for compiling annual human rights reports
  • US embassies are being instructed to categorize foreign DEI policies, abortion subsidies, mass migration facilitation, and certain free speech laws as human rights infringements
  • The Trump administration is using these new rules as "a tool to change the behaviour of governments"

Why it matters

  • This represents a fundamental shift in how the United States evaluates and documents global human rights, moving away from decades of bipartisan consensus on what constitutes human rights violations. The State Department's annual human rights report has historically been the most comprehensive study of its kind by any government, documenting torture, extrajudicial killings, and political persecution. By redefining human rights principles to align with domestic political priorities, the administration risks undermining America's credibility as a global human rights advocate and could provide cover for authoritarian regimes to dismiss legitimate human rights concerns as politically motivated.

What's next

  • No explicit next steps stated in the article

Read full article from source: BBC